Improving Hospital Care through Pay-for-Performance under the Affordable Care Act

On March 23, 2010, President Barack Obama signed into law “The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act”. This law, commonly referred to as the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or “Obamacare”, had two main goals: to lower health insurance rates and to increase the quality of insurance. It sought to do so by lowering the number of uninsured Americans, expanding public and private insurance coverage, and reducing the costs of health care. Some of the more popular elements of the ACA have been highlighted again and again in print and broadcast media. For example, under the ACA: no health insurance company can charge you more for coverage if you’re sick or have a pre-existing condition; insurance companies are barred from setting lifetime or yearly limits on your coverage; and patients are entitled to receive services like immunizations, blood pressure screenings and mammograms without paying a co-pay at their doctor’s office. One element of the ACA, however, has received far less attention – its goal of improving medical care provided by doctors, hospitals, and nurses through the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) program.

Under the Value-Based Purchasing program, Medicare shifted to a pay-for-performance/value system. The goal of the program is to pay hospitals based on the efficiency and quality of care rendered to patients in the hospital as opposed to paying hospitals simply based on volume of patients treated. The VBP program went into effect on October 1, 2012. To fund the program, Medicare initially reduced payment rates to all hospitals by 1% (the amount initially withheld at the beginning of each fiscal year will rise by 0.25% points per year until it is capped at 2% in 2017 and beyond). That money was set aside in a “pot” for incentives. The quality of care provided by hospitals was then measured through a set of clinical quality measures and a composite measure of patient experience. There is also an element of the scoring system that pits hospitals in competition with each other. The scoring is complex and some observers believe unfair, but the end result is that a hospital’s performance will result in either a potential financial bonus, breaking-even, or loss per patient reimbursement. In short, there are potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars at stake each year for hospitals.

As reported by Kaiser Health News in November 2013, at the close of fiscal year 2012-2013, more American hospitals had been penalized than rewarded.  Specifically, 1,451 hospitals across the country were penalized under the pay-for-performance program and had their payment rates decreased. 1,231 hospitals had their payment rates increased.

According to Kaiser, Rhode Island hospitals performed as follows:

Kaiser Rhode Island Hospitals performance

Any percentage number preceded by a subtraction (-) sign indicates that the hospital was paid less than it had been previously.  Any percentage portrayed without a subtraction (-) sign indicates an increase in payment.  Under the VBP program, a loss in payment is suggestive of a “penalty” for failing to meet goals.  View this interactive chart with more U.S. hospitals.

Most experts agree that it is too early in the program to know whether the pay for performance system will meet its intended goal of improving the quality of health care in American hospitals.   What should not be in dispute is that the goal itself is worth pursuing.

For further information on hospital pay-for-performance under VBP, see below:

“Getting ready for value-based purchasing” Today’s Hospitalist

“Patient Satisfaction Critical to Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program” The Hospitalist

“Where is The Value In Health Care?” Forbes

Video Profile

Decof, Decof & Barry

Schedule a Free Consultation

We work for clients on a contingency fee arrangement, which means you pay no legal fee or costs unless we obtain a verdict or settlement for you.

Firm News and Events
Decof, Decof & Barry Recognized among Best Law Firms by U.S. News – Best Lawyers®
Read More
Attorneys of Rhode Island Law Firm Decof, Decof & Barry Named Super Lawyers & Rising Stars
Read More
Michael P. Quinn, Jr. Wins Record Verdict in Medical Malpractice Case in Rhode Island
Read More
From our Blog
How to Legally Prevent Unexpected Medical Bills

May 22, 2018

Nationwide nearly one in three Americans with private insurance received a surprise medical bill between 2014 and 2016. A surprise medical bill is an unexpected bill from an out–of–network provider or from a provider not chosen by a patient. Surprise medical billing happens when a patient goes to a hospital, emergency room or doctor’s office…

Read More

What are the Time Limits to Make a Wrongful Death Case?

May 8, 2018

In Rhode Island, the legislature has enacted the Rhode Island Wrongful Death Statute, also referred to as the Death by Wrongful Act (Law § 10-7-1, et. Seq). There are different sections within the Wrongful Death Act in Rhode Island detailing the following aspects: the types of damages recoverable, by whom the damages are recoverable, who…

Read More

What is the Timeline for a Personal Injury Suit?

April 24, 2018

“It depends.” This is a typical response given by a lawyer in response to any question, but there are good reasons for it. For example, when determining how long you have to file a lawsuit, such as a personal injury case, facts matter. Little details, some known to a client and many unknown, can affect…

Read More

Contact form