Our Civil Justice System Plays Key Role in Car Safety

The GM recall hearings, the Toyota recall hearings, the Firestone recall hearings.  The parade of hearings about manufacturers who knew and did nothing, and regulators who dropped the ball on safety reports, lead us all to one inevitable question:  What does it take to force manufacturers to put people over profits and to improve the safety of their products?  The answer is a robust and independent civil justice system.

The Ford Pinto is a perfect example.  The design of the Ford Pinto left its gas tank unprotected and, as a result, the car was prone to exploding in even minor rear-end accidents.  The car’s design met all government standards at the time.  Ford knew about the problem and knew it could be fixed for as little as $11 per car.  However, Ford decided it would be more profitable to sell the car as designed and let the inevitable injuries occur.  In Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Company (1981) an award of $125 million in punitive damages (later reduced) was paid to the victims of a Pinto explosion.  Indeed, even former General Counsel for Chrysler acknowledges that litigation caused manufacturers to redesign the placement of gas tanks.

Fast forward to this January.  GM recalled 2.6 million vehicles for faulty ignition switches which cause the moving automobiles to unintentionally turn off and thereby disable the airbags.  GM acknowledges it detected the problem in 2001 when it conducted pre-production testing for the Saturn Ion.  In 2005, GM rejected an internal proposal to fix the problem because it would be too costly and take too long.  Current estimates are that repairing the defective switches would have cost $2 per switch.  GM has now linked the defect to at least 13 deaths, but attorneys representing the families of deceased victims place this number much higher.  Now GM is trying to avoid having to defend its actions in civil courts by invoking a liability shield it gained in its 2009 bankruptcy and federal bailout instead of offering a compensation fund.

In the past, manufacturers have had knowledge about numerous design safety issues such as seatbelt design defects, roof strength and roof crush inadequacies, tire failure issues, and general crash worthiness, but decided not to alter designs to address these issues because of expense and because federal safety standards did not require it.  After lawsuits involving these issues were filed, however, many of these design defects were addressed.  As a result, we need a system where federal safety standards and regulations work in conjunction with a vigorous and independent civil justice system.  This is because the civil justice system serves to enforce existing standards, shine a light on concealed defects and regulatory weaknesses, and deter manufacturers from cutting car safety corners to increase profits.

More information about how the civil justice system has spurred auto safety innovations.

Video Profile

Decof, Decof & Barry

Schedule a Free Consultation

We work for clients on a contingency fee arrangement, which means you pay no legal fee or costs unless we obtain a verdict or settlement for you.

Firm News and Events
Decof, Decof & Barry Recognized among Best Law Firms by U.S. News – Best Lawyers®
Read More
Attorneys of Rhode Island Law Firm Decof, Decof & Barry Named Super Lawyers & Rising Stars
Read More
Michael P. Quinn, Jr. Wins Record Verdict in Medical Malpractice Case in Rhode Island
Read More
From our Blog
How to Legally Prevent Unexpected Medical Bills

May 22, 2018

Nationwide nearly one in three Americans with private insurance received a surprise medical bill between 2014 and 2016. A surprise medical bill is an unexpected bill from an out–of–network provider or from a provider not chosen by a patient. Surprise medical billing happens when a patient goes to a hospital, emergency room or doctor’s office…

Read More

What are the Time Limits to Make a Wrongful Death Case?

May 8, 2018

In Rhode Island, the legislature has enacted the Rhode Island Wrongful Death Statute, also referred to as the Death by Wrongful Act (Law § 10-7-1, et. Seq). There are different sections within the Wrongful Death Act in Rhode Island detailing the following aspects: the types of damages recoverable, by whom the damages are recoverable, who…

Read More

What is the Timeline for a Personal Injury Suit?

April 24, 2018

“It depends.” This is a typical response given by a lawyer in response to any question, but there are good reasons for it. For example, when determining how long you have to file a lawsuit, such as a personal injury case, facts matter. Little details, some known to a client and many unknown, can affect…

Read More

Contact form