New Supreme Court Decision Extends Parents’ Claims until Injured Child Turns 18

The Rhode Island Supreme Court recently issued a landmark decision that gives the parents of an injured child a second chance to file their medical malpractice claims if they failed to do so within the child’s first three years.  The decision changes how the statute of limitations works, and opens the door to reviving some parental “loss of society and companionship” claims.

In its decision, filed on May 19, 2015, the Supreme Court gave new meaning to Rhode Island’s statute of limitations for the medical malpractice claims of minors, General Laws 1956 § 9-1-14.1(1).  See Jean Ho-Rath et al. v. Rhode Island Hospital et al., Nos. 12-208, 12-211.  The statute, which requires that malpractice claims be filed within three (3) years from the time of the alleged malpractice, also provided that: “One who is under disability by reason of age * * * and on whose behalf no action is brought within the period of three (3) years from the time of the occurrence of the incident, shall bring the action within three (3) years from the removal of the disability.”

In the Ho-Rath case, the parents filed a medical malpractice suit in 2010 on behalf of their minor daughter, Yendee, who was born in 1998 with a genetic disorder.  The plaintiffs brought suit on behalf of Yendee, as well as themselves, for negligence in the diagnosis and treatment relating to Yendee’s genetic disorder.  The defendants then filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming that the plaintiffs’ claims were time-barred because they were filed after the 3 year statute of limitations.  The Superior Court granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss and reserved Yendee’s right to file a future suit on her own behalf upon reaching the age of 18.

The plaintiffs appealed, and the Supreme Court held that § 9-1-14.1(1) provides a minor plaintiff in a medical malpractice action with two options.  First, the minor’s parent or guardian may file suit on the minor’s behalf within three years of the malpractice or the reasonable discovery of it.  Alternatively, if the minor’s parent or guardian fails to file suit on the minor’s behalf within those three years, then the minor may file suit on his or her own behalf, but not until he or she reaches the age of 18.  Upon reaching the age of 18, he or she has three years within which to file the action.

The Supreme Court further held that a parent’s claim for the damage to the relationship because of the injury should be extended alongside the minor’s claim from which it derives—meaning that, if no suit is filed on behalf of the minor within three years of the malpractice, the parents still have the option to file their claims within the three-year limitations period that opens for the minor upon reaching the age of 18.  Thus, the Ho-Rath parents were not prevented from filing their derivative claims in a future suit brought by Yendee after she attains the age of 18.

The Supreme Court’s holding is significant because it essentially created a second chance for parents to pursue claims related to the injuries of a child.  Prior to this holding, a parent could only file their claims within the first 3 years after their child’s birth.  If they did not file their claims within that time, the parents were forever barred from doing so.  Now, there is another way for parents to recover based on the injuries of their children.

If your child was injured through medical malpractice related to any neonatal care or labor and delivery, we invite you to call us.  In light of the new Supreme Court decision, there are now more options for you to pursue your claims.

Video Profile

Decof, Decof & Barry

Schedule a Free Consultation

We work for clients on a contingency fee arrangement, which means you pay no legal fee or costs unless we obtain a verdict or settlement for you.

Firm News and Events
Decof, Decof & Barry Recognized among Best Law Firms by U.S. News – Best Lawyers®
Read More
Attorneys of Rhode Island Law Firm Decof, Decof & Barry Named Super Lawyers & Rising Stars
Read More
Michael P. Quinn, Jr. Wins Record Verdict in Medical Malpractice Case in Rhode Island
Read More
From our Blog
Is Sorry Enough? Apology Laws and Medical Errors

February 20, 2018

The “Just Say We’re Sorry” movement gaining popularity in the medical field is a poor response to the epidemic of medical errors that plagues our country. Many states have enacted “Apology Laws” that allow doctors and hospitals to corral a victim and their family, explain why and how they caused a life-changing injury during treatment,…

Read More

Can You Sue the VA For Medical Malpractice? Here’s What You Need to Know

February 6, 2018

Every patient has a right to safe and competent medical treatment. Unfortunately, this does not always happen and medical errors have become far too common. A recent series of articles published by USA Today points out that many patients treated in Veterans Administration hospitals and clinics are not receiving the timely and competent care they…

Read More

Eating Out: What You Need to Know About Restaurant Safety

January 23, 2018

We all enjoy a great night out at a high-end restaurant, grabbing a few beers at the bar while watching the game, or a brunch on the weekends at the neighborhood joint. We never want anything to ruin our experiences when we go out. But sometimes bad things happen and injuries can occur. Here are…

Read More

Contact form